Elucidations: Prev Next

This concerns the pragmatics of language

  • Social identities are skills, being a professor/parent is like dribbling a basketball
  • “Calls”
    • Say “Yo, Matt!” to someone in the street. Have recognized Matt as a social partner but also demands Matt recognize me.
  • “Performative” Difference between judge saying “the meeting is adjourned” vs someone outside looking in who tells someone “the meeting is adjourned”
  • “Order”
    • Unlike a call, it is an asymmetric speech action.
    • Responding acknowledges the power gradient.
    • Distinct from requests and treaties
    • If students respond to roll call, they are jointly bringing into being the roles of “teacher” and “student”
  • Gendered/Racial
    • We recognize demographics in certain ways.
      • Data shows people talk to male babies different from female babies
      • Data shows teachers let male students talk for longer before interrupting (even filtering for female Womens’ Studies profs)
  • You can refuse the way someone engages you, but is a tricky negotiation.
    • There’s no way to stay neutral - either have to be aggressive or passive (accept the role you don’t want to be placed in) .
  • A call can be responded to appropriately or inapprorpiate - placing someone in a role puts them in a normative role.
  • Example: school system in DC
    • Nominally egalitarian, however:
      • Good schools are in rich neighborhoods (issues with transportation)
      • Complicated application / interview process
  • Some identities seem chosen vs not
    • Not exactly a clear line (one chooses to work at a sweatshop, but the alternative was starving)
    • Big normative implications for roles that are perceived as a choice
  • The point of analyzing these social roles is to see where it’s possible to intervene
    • Certain problems are only addressible by social organizers
    • We can be more aware of how these roles affect our lives
    • A project of political liberation.
  • What’s a good reason to resist a social role?
    • No general answers - just good reasons for doing anything. E.g. freedom, prevention of human fluorishing.